Tipsheet
What matters at India’s listed companies
Earnings · Shipping · Micro cap

Hariyana's auditor can't verify inventory. 90% of assets sit in opaque partnerships.

A qualified audit opinion, a provision for a dead joint venture, and a nano-cap company where most assets sit outside direct control.


Mkt cap₹63.83 cr
P/E6.25×
ROE1.09%
Debt / eq.0.11
₹13.19 cr Provision taken against a stalled joint venture advance.

What's new

  • Auditors qualified the FY26 accounts, unable to verify inventory after a ₹80.61 lakh write-down.
  • 90.41% of assets (₹140.54 cr) are capital contributions in real estate partnerships.
  • Net profit fell 75% to ₹39.37 lakhs despite revenue rising to ₹17.35 cr.

Why this matters

The audit qualification and extreme asset concentration together mean a market cap of ₹65 crore is sitting on top of opaque real estate partnerships and a ₹13.19 crore provision for an advance that may be unrecoverable. The auditor's report is a formal flag that the books can't be fully trusted.

What we're watching

  • Management's response to the inventory verification failure.
  • The recoverability of the ₹126.11 cr deployed as loans by the partnership firm.
  • Whether the ₹13.19 cr joint venture provision is a final write-off.

The full read

Hariyana Ship Breakers reported a net profit of ₹39.37 lakhs for FY26, a 75% decline from the prior year, even as revenue climbed to ₹17.35 crore. The number that matters is not the profit. It's that the statutory auditors qualified the accounts. They said they could not verify the inventory after a ₹80.61 lakh write-down because management wouldn't provide the physical verification reports. That is a formal red flag. The rest of the report reads like a catalogue of concerns. 90.41% of the company's assets, or ₹140.54 crore, sit as capital contributions in real estate partnerships. One of those partnerships has lent ₹126.11 crore of that money to other companies. On top of that, Hariyana took a ₹13.19 crore provision for an advance to a joint venture that has stalled. For a company with a market cap of ₹65 crore, that is a lot of opaque, off-balance-sheet risk.

Questions answered

Why did the auditors qualify Hariyana Ship Breakers' FY26 results?
The statutory auditors said they could not verify the existence or condition of inventories because management never provided physical verification reports. This came after an ₹80.61 lakh inventory write-down.
What is the concentration risk in the company's asset base?
Over 90% of Hariyana's total assets (₹140.54 crore) are capital contributions in real estate partnership firms. One partnership has lent ₹126.11 crore of these funds to other companies.
How did the company's profitability change in FY26?
Consolidated net profit fell 75% to just ₹39.37 lakhs, even though revenue rose to ₹17.35 crore. The drop was driven by the ₹13.19 crore provision against a failed joint venture advance.
How big is Hariyana relative to its risky assets?
The company has a market capitalization of about ₹65 crore. Its total assets include ₹140.54 crore in real estate partnerships, and it has taken a ₹13.19 crore provision against one advance.
Mentioned: Statutory Auditors · ₹13.19 cr JV provision · ₹126.11 cr partnership loans
Primary source BSE · NSE · Tijori

An independent reading of the company's own disclosure — the primary filing above is the final word.