Tipsheet
What matters at India’s listed companies
Laminates/Decoratives · Micro cap

Deco-Mica ousts two directors who missed every board meeting for a year

The Ahmedabad nano-cap removed both after they failed to attend any sessions in twelve months and didn't seek leave. Their exit is now mandatory under the Companies Act.


Mkt cap₹24.92 cr
P/E16.40×
ROE7.24%
Debt / eq.0.74
0 of 12 Board meetings attended by each director in the past year

What's new

  • Gunjan Pandya and Nupur Modi have been removed from the Deco-Mica board for missing every meeting in 12 months.
  • Neither director sought leave of absence before the board formalized their exit on May 29.
  • The removal is mandatory under Section 167(1)(b) of the Companies Act.

Why this matters

Two directors don't just miss a year of meetings by accident. This is a nano-cap with a ₹26 crore market capitalization, so losing nearly a quarter of its board to enforced resignation is not a minor shuffle. The forced exit signals either deep disengagement or an internal dispute nobody is talking about publicly.

What we're watching

  • Whether Deco-Mica discloses who pushed the non-attendance or why it went unresolved for 12 months.
  • Any changes to board composition to replace the two vacated seats.
  • Auditor commentary on board oversight in the next annual report.

The full read

Deco-Mica removed two of its board members, Gunjan Pandya and Nupur Modi, after both missed every board meeting for twelve straight months. The Ahmedabad nano-cap, with a ₹26 crore market capitalization, said neither director sought leave before the board enforced their exit on May 29 under Section 167(1)(b) of the Companies Act. This is not a resignation story. It is a forced exit after a full year of no-shows, and it means two of the company's directors were effectively absent from oversight for the entire period. For a firm this small, losing two board members to enforced vacancy in one shot is a clear governance failure. The open question is who knew, and why it took twelve months to act.

Questions answered

Why were these directors removed?
Under Section 167(1)(b) of the Companies Act, a director must vacate their seat if they miss all board meetings in a twelve-month period without leave. Both Gunjan Pandya and Nupur Modi hit that threshold.
Could they have avoided removal?
Yes. Either attending a single meeting or formally requesting leave from the board would have prevented the mandatory vacation. The filing states neither director did either.
What kind of company is Deco-Mica?
It is an Ahmedabad-based nano-cap with a ₹26 crore market capitalization. At that size, two board vacancies is a meaningful governance event.
Did these directors hold executive roles?
No. The filing specifies neither was a CEO, CFO, or other executive officer. They served as non-executive directors on the board.
Mentioned: Gunjan Yogesh Pandya · Nupur Bipinchandra Modi · Section 167(1)(b)
Primary source BSE · NSE

An independent reading of the company's own disclosure — the primary filing above is the final word.