Trishakti entered wind energy, reversing January's explicit rejection
CEO said no wind in Jan 2026; Jul 2026 announces wind as strategic growth. Borrowing cost jumps from 4-6% to 8.5-9.75%, unexplained.
What's new
- Q1 FY27 total income ₹1,680 lakhs, up 310% YoY; EBITDA margin 65%.
- Wind energy equipment rental entry: ordered 900-ton machines for 5.0-5.2 MW turbine projects.
- UAE expansion underway; monthly yield quoted at 4% vs India's 2.5%.
- Order book raised to ₹70-72 cr from ₹62 cr for FY27, without identifying incremental bookings.
Themes from the call
Demand
Full fleet utilization at 100%; broad demand across renewables, infra, steel, oil & gas.
Margins
Q1 EBITDA margin 65% but guided to settle at 58-62% as maintenance costs rise; PAT guidance conflicted between 20-25% and 25-30%.
Capital allocation
₹400 cr capex program ₹270 cr deployed; remaining ₹130-150 cr may fund 4-5 wind machines. Borrowing cost now 8.5-9.75% vs earlier 4-6%, pressuring returns.
Guidance watch
- FY27 EBITDA margin 60-65%; PAT margin 20-25% then 25-30% (conflicting).
- Wind equipment revenue expected Q3/Q4 FY27; UAE/KSA deployment in 2-3 quarters.
- Debtor days below 60-70; maintenance cost at 4-5% of revenue over time.
Risk flags
- Wind and international revenue depend on OEM deliveries, customer orders, and approvals — no signed wind order confirmed.
- Borrowing cost jump from 4-6% to 8.5-9.75% materially changes return on equity; not reconciled.
- Order book raised without explaining incremental bookings; multiple guidance conflicts (PAT margin, remaining capex).
Key quotes
-
"We are not even planning to get into the wind energy segment anytime soon because the yields...is not great right now."
— Management, Jan 2026 call -
"When it comes to the yield, it is quite similar to our current machinery."
— Management, Jul 2026 call
The brief
Trishakti Industries posted its strongest quarter ever: total income ₹1,680 lakhs, up 310% YoY, EBITDA margin at 65%, and every machine rented out. The numbers are not the story. Six months ago the CEO said the company would not enter wind energy because yields were poor. This quarter he made wind a strategic pillar, with yields described as similar to the existing fleet. The about-face comes with other contradictions. In April the company said borrowing costs were around 5% flat; now they are 8.5-9.75% — a difference that rewrites the return-on-capital math. The capex mix has shifted from a stated focus on 50-250 ton machines to ordering 900-ton wind units, without explaining why the utilization logic changed. The FY27 order book was raised from ₹62 cr to ₹70-72 cr, but the source of the additions was not identified. Each reversal individually might be explained away. Together they strain credibility. Management has not bridged the gap between what it said before and what it says now. The underlying business looks strong, but the strategy story needs a coherent why. Without it, guidance on future earnings carries less weight than the quarter's headline numbers suggest.
Strong quarter, but four strategy reversals in six months make future guidance harder to underwrite.