Steel Exchange India misses FY26 targets and drops RINL contract
Management reported ₹1,066 cr in revenue against its ₹1,500 cr projection and redirected its utilization narrative toward internal capacity.
What's new
- FY26 total income reached ₹1,066 cr, failing to meet the ₹1,500 cr forecast.
- TMT mill utilization hit 46-47% against the prior 85-90% expectation.
- IMR Group committed ₹300 cr via share warrants for capital infusion.
- Management aims to cut debt costs from 13% to 9% through refinancing.
Themes from the call
Demand
Q4 rebar volumes reached 49,760 tons, with management citing participation in Google's data center hub and ArcelorMittal's projects.
Margins
EBITDA per ton peaked at ₹9,500 in Q4, though the annual average remained at ₹6,800-7,000.
Capital allocation
The company redeemed ₹43 cr in NCDs and is using the IMR Group investment to fund green steel capabilities.
Guidance watch
- Targeting 70-75% rebar utilization in FY27.
Risk flags
- RINL contract performance and status are no longer disclosed.
- Lenders still hold a 100% pledge on promoter shares pending refinancing.
Key quotes
-
"We have already reduced it from 18.75% high-cost debt last year to 13% now. We would like to reduce it further to a sub-10% level."
— Bramhaiah Sheelaperulu, Group Financial Advisor
The brief
Steel Exchange India finished FY26 with a wide gap between its stated goals and its final results. Management reported ₹1,066 cr in total income, missing the ₹1,500 cr mark set in August 2025. While Q4 EBITDA grew 118% sequentially to ₹50 cr, the firm did not bridge the performance gap between its public forecast and the year-end figures.
The RINL contract, once the central pillar of the company's growth strategy, has disappeared from the conversation. Six months ago, management claimed this agreement would push utilization to 90%. That figure finished the year at 47%. The new roadmap shifts focus to an internal reheating furnace to reach 70% utilization, but the failure to explain the RINL shift leaves the origin of the new volume targets unclear.
The IMR Group represents the next phase of the firm's capital strategy. A ₹300 cr warrant subscription provides a new source of funds to pay down debt. With the group having reduced interest costs from 18.75% to 13% already, they are betting that further refinancing and European export plans will stabilize the balance sheet.
Institutional approvals from the Ministry of Defense and new project wins give the firm a path to higher volumes. Yet, with 100% of shares still pledged to lenders, the company remains constrained. The recovery depends on whether these new capacity plans prove more accurate than the last round of guidance.
The IMR investment is a necessary lifeline, but the unacknowledged disappearance of prior capacity targets creates a trust gap.