Tipsheet
What matters at India’s listed companies
Earnings · Trading · Micro cap

CCL International's Q4 revenue jumped 11x. The year was a one-quarter story.

Infrastructure activity swung the nano-cap from a Q3 loss to a Q4 profit. That single quarter accounts for 67% of annual revenue.


Mkt cap₹47.73 cr
P/E18.93×
ROE1.51%
Debt / eq.0.51
₹33.8 cr Q4 revenue, 11x the preceding quarter

What's new

  • Q4 revenue surged to ₹33.8 crore from ₹2.9 crore in Q3.
  • The company swung to a ₹1.5 crore net profit from a ₹0.5 crore loss.
  • Full-year FY26 revenue rose 10% to ₹50.4 crore; net profit grew to ₹0.95 crore from ₹0.72 crore.

Why this matters

The sequential jump is the story. It shows a project-based business where revenue is lumpy, not steady. For a nano-cap, one strong quarter can define the entire year's financial profile.

What we're watching

  • Whether the infrastructure-driven Q4 momentum carries into Q1 FY27.
  • The sustainability of the 10% full-year growth amid quarterly lumpiness.
  • Gross margin trajectory as the project mix shifts.

The full read

CCL International's year ended with a bang. Q4 revenue hit ₹33.8 crore, up from ₹2.9 crore in Q3, driven by infrastructure projects. That single quarter accounts for 67% of the full-year total of ₹50.4 crore. The company posted a ₹1.5 crore profit in Q4 after losing ₹0.5 crore in Q3. For the full year, profit grew to ₹0.95 crore from ₹0.72 crore, a 32% increase on 10% revenue growth. The annual numbers look steady. The quarterly profile is anything but. This is a project business, and its results arrive in lump. The full-year growth is real, but it is almost entirely a Q4 story.

Questions answered

What drove the massive sequential revenue jump in Q4?
The company attributed the surge from ₹2.9 crore to ₹33.8 crore to increased activity in its infrastructure segment. The filing does not specify the exact contracts or projects involved.
How did profitability change for the full year?
Full-year net profit rose to ₹0.95 crore from ₹0.72 crore a year earlier, on 10% revenue growth to ₹50.4 crore. The improvement was modest relative to the Q4 swing.
What does the Q3 loss tell us about the business model?
The ₹0.5 crore loss in the December quarter, followed by a ₹1.5 crore profit in Q4, highlights the inherent volatility. This is a project business, not a steady earner.
Is the 10% annual growth meaningful?
On a full-year basis, revenue rose to ₹50.4 crore. However, the annual number is heavily skewed by the single strong Q4; the preceding nine months were much weaker.
Mentioned: Infrastructure segment · Q4 FY26 · Nano-cap
Primary source BSE · NSE

An independent reading of the company's own disclosure — the primary filing above is the final word.