<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Nitta Gelatin India Ltd. (NITTAGELA) — Tipsheet</title>
    <link>https://tipsheet.markets/company/nittagela/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://tipsheet.markets/company/nittagela/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Every Tipsheet Editorial note covering Nitta Gelatin India Ltd. (NITTAGELA), newest first. Grounded in BSE/NSE primary-source filings.</description>
    <language>en-in</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:38:35 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>DGFT halves Nitta Gelatin&#39;s raw material allowance. It plans to fight back.</title>
      <link>https://tipsheet.markets/nittagela-dgft-halves-nitta-gelatin-s-raw-material-allowance-it-plans-to-fight-back-105834/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tipsheet.markets/nittagela-dgft-halves-nitta-gelatin-s-raw-material-allowance-it-plans-to-fight-back-105834/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>New norms slash the permissible gel bones input per tonne of output by 47%, targeting the micro-cap&#39;s import-heavy cost base. The company is seeking reconsideration.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New norms slash the permissible gel bones input per tonne of output by 47%, targeting the micro-cap's import-heavy cost base. The company is seeking reconsideration.</em></p>
<h3>What’s new</h3><ul><li>DGFT revised norms for gelatin, allowing only 3.92 tonnes of gel bones per tonne of output, down from 7.35 tonnes.</li><li>The change nearly halves the permitted raw material for a company that imports its key input.</li><li>Nitta Gelatin is evaluating the impact and will petition the Ministry of Commerce and its industry body.</li></ul>
<h3>Why it matters</h3><p>The norm is a regulatory lever on Nitta Gelatin's core cost structure. A lower permissible input could force the company to either achieve a much higher manufacturing yield or lose the duty-free benefit on its import bill. The company's immediate pushback suggests the new standard may not match its actual process.</p>
<h3>What we’re watching</h3><ul><li>The Ministry of Commerce's response to Nitta Gelatin's representations.</li><li>Any quantified financial or operational impact disclosure from the company.</li><li>Whether the industry body mounts a collective challenge to the new norm.</li></ul>
<h3>The full read</h3><p>Nitta Gelatin's raw-material math just changed. New DGFT norms allow only <strong>3.92 tonnes</strong> of gel bones to produce a tonne of gelatin, down from <strong>7.35 tonnes</strong>. That is a <strong>47%</strong> cut in the permitted input. For a micro-cap that imports its key material, this directly targets its cost base. The company is evaluating the impact but won't accept the rule quietly. It plans to argue its case to the Ministry of Commerce. The move could lower costs if Nitta can meet the tighter yield standard. Or it could mean the company must source more material outside the duty-free window. The notification is issued. The challenge is underway.</p>
<p>Primary source: <a href="https://www.bseindia.com/corporates/ann.html?scrip=506532&dur=A">BSE</a> · <a href="https://www.nseindia.com/companies-listing/corporate-filings-announcements?symbol=NITTAGELA">NSE</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>Other</category>
      <dc:creator>Tipsheet Editorial</dc:creator>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>